InteractiveDox vs ReadMe
ReadMe documents your API. InteractiveDox documents how customers use your whole product, and proves each workflow still works.
Credit where it is due
ReadMe is built for interactive API reference: try-it consoles, usage metrics, and now an AI Writer that watches your pull requests and drafts doc updates on a review branch. Everything it maintains is inferred from the repo. Nothing executes the documented workflow against the live product, and nothing covers the how-to guidance, video, or training that lives outside your API surface.
ReadMe
API docs hub
InteractiveDox
one platform
One capture. One source of truth. Always current for your customers.
Where InteractiveDox goes further.
Beyond API docs
ReadMe stops at reference. InteractiveDox captures the workflows around your product into step-by-step guides, narrated video and SCORM training, all from one recording, so customers get the whole picture, not just the endpoints.
Reference syncs. Workflows drift.
An OpenAPI spec can stay in sync automatically; the workflows around your product cannot. Onboarding a customer, connecting an integration, configuring a webhook: InteractiveDox re-walks those documented steps against your live product and names the one that broke.
Metrics show usage, not correctness.
ReadMe's API metrics tell you who called which endpoint. They cannot tell you whether the documented workflow still works. InteractiveDox answers that with scheduled verification, so the support tickets that start with 'the docs say' stop arriving.
Questions, answered
ReadMe is scoped to API reference and developer hubs. InteractiveDox covers the workflows around your product too: it captures them into how-to guides, produces narrated video and SCORM training from the same capture, and re-runs each workflow against your live product to prove it still works. It also generates API reference, so you keep the developer experience and gain guidance that stays current for every customer.