comparison

InteractiveDox vs Mintlify

InteractiveDox records a real workflow in your product and publishes it as a customer guide, a narrated video and a training course, then re-runs that workflow against your live product on a schedule. A broken step gets found by a check instead of by a customer. Mintlify publishes MDX from a repo.

Mintlify

developer docs host

InteractiveDox

one platform

The docs site itself
Polished docs site from markdown and MDX
Interactive API reference from an OpenAPI spec
Drift detection on the spec, with a one click refresh
Docs live in a real git repository, every save a commit
Web editor plus CLI preview
Around 38 MDX blocks: steps, callouts, tabs, parameter fields
Flow diagram editor that bakes to print sharp SVG
Reusable snippets and glossary tooltips applied on read
Free tier for open source projects
Content made from your product
The guide drafts itself from a recorded workflowOnly us
You write every page
Browser extension capture, click by click, with element context
Desktop capture across native apps, beyond the browser
Passwords and tokens masked on the device before upload
Capture limited to a workspace approved list of sites
A narrated, branded video from the same capture
MP4 export rendered in your browser
Per language audio versions of that video
Training module with lessons and a graded exam
SCORM package pushed to your LMS
Staying true to the product
Documented workflows re-run against the live product on a scheduleOnly us
Agent PRs from code diffs
Catches drift that no code diff shows
Runs against private systems behind your firewall
Execution stays on your machine, so secrets never reach us
A failed check names the exact step that broke
A failed check drafts its own fixOnly us
You edit each page by hand
Human in the loop decisions, with Slack, Teams, email and WhatsApp alerts
Per page staleness flags before a customer hits the page
Nine execution adapters: AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, Docker, SSH, HTTP, browser, read only DB
What your readers get
AI answers on your docs, with citations
Those answers are anonymous and cost you nothing per question
Metered AI credits
Unlimited parallel versions: draft, active, deprecated
Per version locales with structure preserving translation
A/B experiments on documentation pages
Zero result searches turned into ranked page suggestions
llms.txt and sitemap for agents
Password protected and privately authenticated portals
Governance, approvals and audit
SSO, SCIM and role based access control
Audit log
Tamper evident, hash chained audit trail with a verify endpoint
Multi approver publish workflow with a visual builder
Signature backed approvals, drawn or typed, with consent
Approved documents sealed as a hash verified PDF
SOPs that supersede rather than overwrite, with full lineage
Regulations researched for your company with sources, then monitored on your scheduleOnly us
AI economics and operations
Bring your own model key on any workspace
One usage ledger with per model dollar rates
Your own coding agent reads and writes the docs over MCP
Several workspaces and portals under one account
Real time co-editing with live cursors
Import from GitBook, Notion, Confluence, GitHub and Markdown

A full circle ships it, a half circle ships part of it, a dash does not. Italics say what the other tool leaves you doing.

One capture becomes the guide, the video and the course, and all three get checked against the product your customers are using today.

what you get

What InteractiveDox does with it.

01

The first draft comes out of the product

Record the workflow once from your browser or your desktop. Every click gets captured with its real element context, including inside shadow DOM, and comes back as a drafted guide with screenshots, numbered steps and prose you edit rather than write. The repository underneath stays exactly where it was, and every save is still a commit.

02

Your docs run like a test suite

Each documented workflow re-runs against the live product on a schedule. A failing page gets flagged at the exact step, the way a failing test names its assertion, with a screenshot of what the run found instead. Your customers never have to be the ones who discover it.

03

It sees what a code diff cannot

Executing the workflow walks the same path a customer walks, so it catches a permission that changed in a console, a feature flag that flipped, a plan limit that moved, and a payment or identity screen you do not own. None of those four ever appear in a pull request.

04

One recording, three surfaces

The same capture ships a how to guide, a narrated and branded walkthrough video with an MP4 you render in your own browser, and a training course with lessons and a graded exam you can push to your LMS as SCORM. Support, customer success and product education read from one source instead of three that disagree.

05

Your key, your budget, your ledger

Bring your own provider key on any workspace, with no enterprise contract required, and read one usage ledger priced per model in dollars per million tokens. Reader questions run on self hosted retrieval, so an anonymous visitor asking twenty questions never lands on your bill.

06

Evidence a regulator will accept

SOPs supersede rather than overwrite, with lineage in both directions. Approvals can require a real drawn or typed signature with consent, enforced on the server. The approved document gets sealed as a hash verified PDF with a certificate page, on a tamper evident audit chain.

switching

Moving from Mintlify

You keep the parts of docs as code your team likes. Git stays, MDX stays, and your coding agent keeps its write access.

1

Bring the pages across

Import from GitHub, GitBook, Notion, Confluence or plain Markdown. Your MDX maps onto the reader vocabulary here, around 38 blocks, so pages arrive as real components rather than flattened prose.

2

Keep the git habit

Every portal is a real GitHub repository and every save is a commit. Point your own coding agent at it over MCP and it reads and writes on your token budget, exactly as it does today.

3

Add the lane you did not have

Record one real workflow, publish the guide, and put it on a schedule. The first time a release breaks it you get a report naming the step instead of a support ticket naming your company.

FAQ

Questions, answered

Yes, and for a wider set of teams. It gives you the git native portal on your own domain, the OpenAPI driven API reference with a live playground, the component library, versions and locales. Then it adds capture that drafts the page from a real workflow, scheduled verification against your live product, and drafted updates when the product moves. It also serves support, customer success and product teams with how to guides, walkthrough videos and training courses generated from the same recording.

request a demo

Watch your help docs update themselves this week.

Bring the one workflow customers always get stuck on. Leave with the article, the video, the course, and a check that tells you the day any of them stops being true.

  • One real workflow from your product, captured in minutes
  • The help article, walkthrough video, and training course, generated for you
  • A scheduled check that re-runs it against your live product
  • A drafted update the moment a release changes the flow

Prefer email? Reach us at hello@interactivedox.com.