comparison

InteractiveDox vs Docusaurus

InteractiveDox gives you the hosted, branded portal, a browser editor anyone on the team can use, and a scheduled check that every documented workflow still runs against your live product. Git stays underneath: one repository per portal, every save a commit. Docusaurus is a framework you build and then keep running.

Docusaurus

open source static site generator

InteractiveDox

one platform

The docs site
MDX pages with real components
Versioned documentation
Internationalisation
Search
Interactive API reference from an OpenAPI spec
Flow diagram editor, snippets and glossary tooltips
Complete control over every pixel and every plugin
Free, open source, with no vendor able to change the terms
Everything you would otherwise build and run
Hosting, custom domain and automated SSL, managed for youOnly us
You build and run it
A browser editor a non developer can use
A pull request
Server enforced permissions on every write
Repo access
Framework upgrades and security patches handled
Page analytics, search analytics and reader feedback
You wire it up
A/B experiments on documentation pages
AI answers on your docs, anonymous, cited, with no per question bill
Zero result searches turned into ranked page suggestions
Password protected and privately authenticated portals
Media library shared by the editor and the capture tools
Content made from your product
The guide drafts itself from a recorded workflowOnly us
Someone writes every page
Browser extension capture, click by click, with element context
Desktop capture across native apps, beyond the browser
Passwords and tokens masked on the device before upload
A narrated, branded video from the same capture
MP4 export rendered in your browser
Training module with lessons and a graded exam
SCORM package pushed to your LMS
Staying true to the product
Documented workflows re-run against the live product on a scheduleOnly us
Catches drift that no code diff shows
Runs against private systems behind your firewall
Execution stays on your machine, so secrets never reach us
A failed check names the exact step that broke
A failed check drafts its own fixOnly us
Human in the loop decisions, with Slack, Teams, email and WhatsApp alerts
Per page staleness flags before a customer hits the page
Nine execution adapters: AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, Docker, SSH, HTTP, browser, read only DB
Governance, evidence and audit
Multi approver publish workflow with a visual builder
Branch protection
Tamper evident, hash chained audit trail with a verify endpoint
Signature backed approvals, drawn or typed, with consent
Approved documents sealed as a hash verified PDF
SOPs that supersede rather than overwrite, with full lineage
Regulations researched for your company with sources, then monitored on your scheduleOnly us
Per framework AI assistants that read only your controlled documents
AI and operations
Docs live in a real git repository, every save a commit
Bring your own model key, with one per model dollar ledger
Your own coding agent reads and writes the docs over MCP
Build it yourself
Several products and portals under one account
Several repositories
Real time co-editing with live cursors
Import from GitBook, Notion, Confluence, GitHub and Markdown

A full circle ships it, a half circle ships part of it, a dash does not. Italics say what the other tool leaves you doing.

You keep git and MDX. The platform around them stops being yours to maintain, and the pages start proving they are still true.

what you get

What InteractiveDox does with it.

01

You keep git, you drop the plumbing

Every portal is a real GitHub repository and every save is a commit, so the thing Docusaurus teams value most survives intact. What goes away is the build pipeline, the hosting bill, the Algolia configuration and the plugin you forked in 2024 and now cannot upgrade.

02

Anyone on the team can publish

Editing happens in a browser, with permissions resolved server side as an action catalog rather than repository access. The support lead who spotted a wrong step fixes it themselves, and it still lands as a commit. Publishing can be routed through an approval flow when you want a gate.

03

Your docs run like a test suite

Each documented workflow re-runs against the live product on a schedule, and a failing page gets flagged at the exact step with a screenshot of what the run found instead. That includes drift no code diff shows, such as a permission that changed in a console or a payment screen you do not own.

04

The first draft comes out of the product

Record the workflow once from your browser or your desktop and the guide comes back with screenshots, numbered steps and prose. Removing the blank page is what gets onboarding, admin tasks and troubleshooting written at all, rather than only the pages engineers wanted to write.

05

One recording, three surfaces

The same capture ships a how to guide, a narrated branded video with an MP4 rendered in your own browser, and a training course with lessons and a graded exam you can push to your LMS as SCORM.

06

Evidence a regulator will accept

SOPs supersede rather than overwrite, with lineage in both directions. Approvals can require a real drawn or typed signature with consent, enforced on the server. The approved document gets sealed as a hash verified PDF with a certificate page, on a tamper evident audit chain.

switching

Moving from Docusaurus

Your MDX, your versions and your git habits all survive. The pipeline you have been maintaining does not.

1

Import the docs folder

Bring your Markdown and MDX across. Pages arrive as real components in the reader vocabulary, and versions and locales map onto first class versions and locales rather than folder conventions.

2

Retire the pipeline

Hosting, custom domain, automated SSL, search indexing and upgrades stop being yours. The repository stays: one per portal, every save a commit, and your own coding agent can read and write it over MCP.

3

Open it to the rest of the team

Give support and customer success a browser editor with server enforced permissions, then record one real workflow and put it on a schedule.

FAQ

Questions, answered

Three things a build step cannot do. Anyone on the team can publish from a browser with server enforced permissions instead of a pull request. Pages get drafted from recorded product workflows instead of a blank editor. And each documented workflow re-runs against your live product on a schedule, so a broken step gets found by a failing check rather than by a customer. Hosting, SSL, search, analytics, approvals and audit come with it rather than being yours to assemble.

request a demo

Watch your help docs update themselves this week.

Bring the one workflow customers always get stuck on. Leave with the article, the video, the course, and a check that tells you the day any of them stops being true.

  • One real workflow from your product, captured in minutes
  • The help article, walkthrough video, and training course, generated for you
  • A scheduled check that re-runs it against your live product
  • A drafted update the moment a release changes the flow

Prefer email? Reach us at hello@interactivedox.com.